The constitutionally powerful office has historically served as a political cul-de-sac, with no vice president ever elected to the presidency.
The office of Vice President in Sierra Leone, though constitutionally powerful, has consistently failed to serve as a pathway to the presidency. Analysis suggests that vice presidents are often appointed for political balancing, regional appeasement, or to neutralize rivals, rather than to cultivate future leadership. This practice has resulted in most vice presidents lacking a clear succession plan or an independent political base, hindering their presidential ambitions.
Historical examples illustrate this pattern. Sorie Ibrahim Koroma and Francis Minah, under Siaka Stevens, were influential but not groomed for succession, with Minah facing peril. Solomon Ekuma Berewa, despite being well-prepared and involved in governance, lost the 2007 election, demonstrating that competence alone was insufficient. Victor Bockarie Foh's tenure was brief and politically constrained, and Samuel Sam-Sumana's experience highlights how estrangement from the president can lead to political isolation.
The current vice president faces a similar historical trajectory, where the office's structure and political realities have historically prevented its occupants from ascending to the presidency. The recurring debate questions whether the vice presidency is a curse or a blessing, with evidence suggesting it often acts as a political liability rather than an incubator for presidential success.
Why it mattersThe vice presidency in Sierra Leone is a political cul-de-sac, affecting the career trajectory of individuals holding the office and preventing them from reaching the presidency.
Read in the ASJ desk →