Recent scenes in the National Assembly raise fundamental questions about the purpose of parliamentary institutions.
Namibia's parliament, intended to hold government accountable to the people, is reportedly descending into disorder. While vigorous debate and disagreement are healthy for a functioning democracy, the recent disruptions in the National Assembly appear to be overshadowing the core purpose of the institution. The focus has shifted from substantive argument to personal confrontation, prompting a re-evaluation of what parliament is truly for.
The institution of parliament, a significant achievement of civilization, evolved to ensure that national affairs are not solely determined by the executive but are subjected to public argument and scrutiny by elected representatives. Originating from historical struggles for consent and representation, parliament's fundamental proposition is that government must listen to the governed, providing a mechanism for societal grievances and interests to reach the center of power.
The historical development of parliamentary traditions highlights its role as a place where power is interrogated, not merely a stage for political posturing. Early parliaments, such as those in England, saw representatives challenge corruption and hold officials accountable. This essential function, where words serve as instruments of accountability, is what a new generation of Namibian parliamentarians seems in danger of neglecting amidst the current disarray.
Why it mattersThe disorder in parliament affects citizens by obscuring the institution's primary function of holding the government answerable to the people.
Read in the ASJ desk →