Companies linked to Sudan's war economy are circumventing international sanctions by obscuring their affiliations and manipulating business fronts.
International sanctions imposed on individuals and companies tied to Sudan's civil war have proven ineffective in curbing war profiteering, according to a new report. Entities designated by the US, UK, EU, and UN have adapted by obfuscating their connections to parent companies and operating through shell corporations. For instance, the Export Development Group, a subsidiary of the sanctioned Defense Industries Systems, presented itself at a London business forum for Sudan's reconstruction while downplaying its affiliation with the military conglomerate.
The Sudan Transparency and Policy Tracker (SPTP) report highlights that sanctions have been narrowly drawn and loosely enforced, allowing targeted entities to adapt quickly. Zadna International, a DIS subsidiary sanctioned by multiple governments, has reportedly become a primary beneficiary of contracts in army-controlled areas. The company was awarded a contract to resurface a road in Gezira state for approximately $7 million, a cost ten times higher than a previous estimate for similar work.
While some sanctions have had limited impact, such as preventing arms sales from Pakistan and Turkey, many sanctioned entities continue to operate and profit from the conflict. The ease with which these companies maneuver around restrictions underscores the challenges in effectively implementing policy responses to Sudan's ongoing crisis, where humanitarian needs are escalating.
Why it mattersInvestors are affected as companies linked to Sudan's war economy are evading sanctions, potentially impacting reconstruction efforts and financial transparency.
Read in the ASJ desk →